Obama has been the US President for 6 years and has
been the subject of fierce criticisms from the Right and sometimes from the
Left for most of the 6 years. It is
probably sufficient at this point to evaluate his performance, even with two more
years in the WH.
To begin with, it is not off the mark to say he qualifies as
a war criminal under any conventional definitions or if he were the president
of a weak country. Giving Obama the
Nobel Prize in Peace is, in contrast to popular thinking, entirely consistent
with the Prize’s character. Obama has
largely continued Bush’s war policies after Bush, often even exceeding in the
details. He has bombed many countries,
killing many civilians, even with his definition of military aged men as
automatic enemies. But this is naturally
true for any US
presidents, and you are a war criminal only if NYT says you are. So why beat the dead horse here?
On the other hand, anybody other than Obama residing in the
WH right now is likely to have been more blood thirsty than he is. Can you imagine what Hillary, McCain, or
Romney would have done? So, Obama does
deserve a few credits, even if not everything he claims for or what some
supporters or critics say.
1. Ending the Iraq War, notwithstanding the recent ISIS situations.
Obama claims he withdrew the US
troops from Iraq,
and his critics in the Right said he was wrong to do so. But the agreement with the Iraqi government
was negotiated with Bush, and Obama actually tried but failed to get Iraqis’
concessions on troops, so the US
had no choice but to leave. It is
disingenuous for Obama to claim credit, and it is also disingenuous for critics
to blast him for this.
Obama’s score card: 30 (from 0 to 100, with 100 being the
most humanly decent action).
2. Afghan war. Simply
natural flows from Bush’s and Obama’s policies.
Less US ground assaults, but more drone attacks. No more renditions, just bombs away. This also applies to other countries US had
attacked and is currently attacking.
Obama’s score card: 0.
3. Iran. Obama has been negotiating and so far
resisted bombing and even blocked the Israelis from doing so. This is something any of his major presidential
challengers and presidents before and after Obama would have done differently. Hillary is always a hawk, McCain sang “bomb
bomb bomb” in 2008, and Romney, largely a novice, would offer no resistance
from conventional Washington
thinking. The only thing preventing
Obama from resolving the Iranian nuclear issue is Israel
keeps bogus documents and accusations alive, and Obama has no stomach to defy
it and the long standing US
hostility towards Iran. So the peace prospect remains dim. Still, we need to consider the fact that
anybody, even the President, is constrained by circumstances, conventions, and
the system. So Obama has done something
unthinkable, whether or not he possesses the courage to finish the right thing.
Obama’s score card: 90.
4. Cuba. Obama announced in Dec 2014 to start
normalization with Cuba,
reversing a US
policy of the past 50 years. This is
another remarkable thing Obama has done, or said so far. On the other hand, this is something recent US presidents
had thought of: clearly the right thing to do in their mind and with the
support of most Americans. But they
failed to act because of a few vocal Cuban-Americans in FL. In reality, this is not as a big deal as the Iran issue, and
maybe the 2014 mid-term congressional losses spurred Obama, but it still
requires courage.
Obama’s score card: 70.
5. Syria. Obama has taken side in the Syrian civil war
but resisted bombing Assad’s forces directly.
The UN have blocked the authorization of force, having learned the Libya
lesson, so Obama has a cover and can’t claim much of the credit. Yet, a notable episode is the so-called
Syrian chemical attack in August, 2013. Obama
had previously set a red line for the use of WMD, which was silly: what is the
difference? But when the reports of
chemical attack came in, Obama was forced to say something and act, and he
acted belligerently, even when the evidence then and till now never implicated
Assad. With Obama ready to pull the
trigger, it was Russia
that actually saved him from being Bush, and it did require brain and gut from
Obama to climb down. Brain: Obama likely
knew soon afterwards that the evidence against Assad was weak to nil, so he and
his people never claimed as much later.
But US presidents knew the initial reports to be wrong all the time,
think LBJ, but few had the gut to reverse course. Thus, it did take Obama nerve to correct his own
mistake. Critics all blasted Obama for
drawing a red line then failing to act on it, but few considers whether it is
the right thing to do, or is the credibility of a president more important than
human decency?
Obama’s score card: 60.
6. Healthcare. ACA is
Obama’s signature domestic achievement.
It is controversial only because it is a big issue affecting everybody
and so many interest groups. Considering
how expensive and how ineffective American healthcare system is, reform is
inevitable, but if you want to enroll more people but keep the existing system
largely intact, you have to have individual mandates, hence, taxes and
penalties. ACA provisions are reasonable
or supportable for anybody, but the only real objections are about cost. Can we afford it? Many people object to the extra, usually
small expenses and further elevate the issue to a matter of personal
freedom. At the end of the day, this is
something people need to consider: what kind of country should the US be, and is healthcare
a right? Regardless, Obama deserves
credit for doing something instead of just talking, even if his negotiation and
promotion of ACA has been faulty.
Obama’s score card: 70.
7. Surveillance, transparency, and torture. Obama campaigned to have the most transparent
administration ever, but his is arguably the least in recent memories. He has come down hard on unofficial leaks,
while official leaks continue. What has
Obama done with regard to Snowden’s leaks of NSA? Nothing, except trying to get Snowden. In fairness, this kind of NSA activities have
gone on forever, increased with technical feasibilities. Critics of ACA often have no qualm with NSA,
even though NSA has been infringing on privacy and freedom much longer. Then the CIA torture issue. Obama banned it after he took office, but it
is largely ceremonial, as few will think the US is no longer engaged in such
acts, just that no longer an official figure like Cheney is openly advocating
it. This remains a system matter,
remember Abu Ghraib, by the US
military and other agencies? Obama’s
position rang hollow with his refusal prosecute anybody in the Bush
administration and senior CIA officials.
Obama’s score card: 0.
8. Other policies.
Despite a minority of points above, Obama has continued long-standing
domestic and international US policies for the most part. Understandably, it is hard to change or defy
a system. Notably is the SONY-North
Korea-Obama spar in Dec 2014. In short,
SONY computer system was recently hacked, and North Korea was suspected because
of a SONY movie “The Interview”, and Obama retaliated by blocking North Korea
internet access. But the role of North Korea in
SONY hacking is never proven, and the evidence is not even much or strong to
begin with. Obama likely felt he must do
something, or anything, to placate his critics, so he chose internet outage as
a punishment. At least it is not bombs,
but wait, North Korea
has THE bomb too!
Obama’s score card: same as every other president.
In summary, Obama is the best anyone can have among the few
choices there were and all recent US presidents. He did or didn’t do certain things anybody
else wouldn’t or would have done. His
policies along with his skin color have promoted enough animosities in the
American political system that it is largely paralyzed for the past several
years. While Obama can still do
something in the next two years to further distinguish himself in history, the
long term prospect of peace is not promising and likely worsened after 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.